well timed and powerful, not least because the former implies a child to take care of
would you rather that there be a heaven and hell (assume that: exactly equal numbers of people go to each, the level suffering felt in hell is exactly equivalent to the amount of pleasure felt in heaven), or that there be neither?
Neither. Heaven and hell act as incentives for people to do good and reduce global suffering, yet the way you put it implies people will experience heightened happiness at the expense of the suffering of others, which makes it a grim concept.
Would you rather start a revolution (and cause great pain and conflict) to improve society (In your eyes), or maintain peace at the expense of perfection? (Consider both Hitler's campaign and the Civil Rights Movement as examples)
Hard choice. Probably pianist because it would make me look more refined than I am. I do have a soft spot for Louis Armstrong, but still, a piano vibes with me more.
Would you rather live in permanent scorching summer or everlasting freezing winter? Assume snow is not an issue.